Quite so, and in our genre of porn there's the whole business of enjoying the creation process of your story in a special way. That's why I can't really understand why would anyone replace this with using an LLM.KittyUmbrass wrote: Sat Jan 17, 2026 2:20 am... Creators are going to create, because the act of creating and the work it involves are a part of our humanity. We'll do it even if it never makes a penny for us, because the endeavour and the soul is important in itself. Those are precisely the things that genAI is built to remove.
Yet another problem here -- how exactly does one become a clinician good enough to overrule the machine when the latter does all diagnosing? There seems to be no good way out of this.First thing is that that isn't strictly genAI. The neural net/machine-learning systems used for medical diagnoses (for example) are clearly trained on relevant data, so wouldn't be the same as plagiarism machines.
Even then, unintentional biases can creep in. I have read of how biases in machine-learning data also crop up in translations. These machines tend to very strongly reflect the baises around race, gender, sexuality etc that are a problem in society already.